<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Machisma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://femaleledrelationships.net/superior-supremacy-female/more-machisma/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://femaleledrelationships.net/female-led-historical-curiosities/more-machisma</link>
	<description>Female dominance, male submission without the stereotypes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:03:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard in Durham, NC</title>
		<link>http://femaleledrelationships.net/female-led-historical-curiosities/more-machisma#comment-1298</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard in Durham, NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femaleledrelationships.net/?p=401#comment-1298</guid>
		<description>I brought that old post to the front because I hope there&#039;s be something that appealed to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I brought that old post to the front because I hope there&#8217;s be something that appealed to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zen heliotrope</title>
		<link>http://femaleledrelationships.net/female-led-historical-curiosities/more-machisma#comment-1297</link>
		<dc:creator>zen heliotrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femaleledrelationships.net/?p=401#comment-1297</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that the 1970s photo of the female bodybuilder was exploitive, not compared to what bodybuilders of either sex wear today. But I find strong females, physically and otherwise, delightful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that the 1970s photo of the female bodybuilder was exploitive, not compared to what bodybuilders of either sex wear today. But I find strong females, physically and otherwise, delightful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: femaleledrelationships.net @ 2012-02-07 06:40:32 -->
