Comments on: Mistress Sarah Palin

By: Shadowlady

Shadowlady — Sat, 23 Jul 2011 06:55:45 +0000

Sarah Palin portrays and image of what men would like to be in a female form.
To me she does not seem dominant at all Just bratty and spoiled

By: dave

dave — Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:00:48 +0000

You must have one wonderful wife! I do hope her legs are beautiful!

By: dave

dave — Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:58:27 +0000

Having a beautiful woman as leader of this country would be awesome. Because there are so many fatherless families President Palin should make a law that ALL husbands be castrated so the population would be in check. That way the woman would have control over her husband since other women wouldn’t want a man who could no longer produce. I also think men in those relationships should have to shave their legs to further keep them in check, all the while if the wife needs sex she could get it elsewhere. So far the men who run this country have done a poor job so it’s time for a woman, a dominant woman, to take over.

By: bootlicker

bootlicker — Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:18:24 +0000

There are those who believe that Mistress Sarah Palin fails as a Dominatrix, the same as She failed as a political candidate. They will tell you that She lacks the intellectual and mental depth to be a true superior, and that She focuses so tightly on the political dimension that She cannot deliver as a Domina.

She has endorsed Her own daughter’s acceptance of the male-controlling model, these detractors will point out, and knuckled under to a man to take second place on the ticket (although it was as vice-president!).

Yes, Mistress Sarah has the look, and even some of the strut, but She doesn’t measure up to the Dominatrix image of Mistress Condoleeza Rice. Now there is a fox!

By: subhubbyboy

subhubbyboy — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:14:32 +0000

My wife/mistress made me vote for the PALIN ticket.
I was punished when she lost.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:23:35 +0000

H Clinton is a man

By: tacslave

tacslave — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:58:24 +0000

Yea the effect’s of the female hormonal soup as oppossed to the huge amount of testosterone in men. For men its positives are strength and spatial intellect, and Women its empathy and communication. Both genders have negative’s from their unique hormone’s but even there the mens negatives are much worse. Is the only thing you know about Women the clitoris and vagina Enoch!!!?

By: Joe

Joe — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:36:39 +0000

Ms. Palin would be an excellent president. Not only is she intelligent and experienced, but she’s also beautiful. She would be a great roll model for other women and would help men admit that women are the superior gender. Also, she would be showing those crazy Muslims that times have changed.

By: Enoch Soames

Enoch Soames — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:40:00 +0000

Biological attributes? Clitoris, vagina?

By: tacslave

tacslave — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:02:40 +0000

Hilary or/and Sarah as a mistress is a good fantasy but Women don’t have to be smarter to be superior. One must look to a persons talents… is she good enough to be President? Nope, I dont think Obama is either. The point of Female Supremacy is about the feminine attributes being better for the future world.. intelligence is too individually diverse to have either gender broadly considered more intelligent then the other. Both sexes are good at different things… its just IMO the future would benefit much more from the feminine biological attributes then the male ones.