Comments on: Female Superiority : Scientific Fact http://femaleledrelationships.net/superior-supremacy-female/female-superiority-scientific-fact Female dominance, male submission without the stereotypes Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:03:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Shadowlady http://femaleledrelationships.net/superior-supremacy-female/female-superiority-scientific-fact#comment-1157 Shadowlady Sun, 19 Dec 2010 18:13:20 +0000 http://www.femaleledrelationships.net/?p=283#comment-1157 I have never heard so much science misused in an argument. For starters a geneticist will never ever go XX and Xy. It is XX and XY. As for the diseases - and being prone to it. There is such a thing as men often being in more hostile environments. Yes due to the XX vs XY genes women are much less prone to some diseases, but because of that they can be carriers and as such spreaders of genetic diseases (unwillingly) So who is the parasite if you look at it from that perspective? Secondly the "logical' conclusions drawn from it are beyond the point where I want to consider start to counter the total and utter gibberish. There is so so much we do not know about genetics that this is just fantasy thrown in with some scientific facts and twisted and turned to show what you want it to show. Before I end up lecturing, I sign off shaking my head in utter disbelief. I have never heard so much science misused in an argument. For starters a geneticist will never ever go XX and Xy. It is XX and XY.
As for the diseases – and being prone to it. There is such a thing as men often being in more hostile environments. Yes due to the XX vs XY genes women are much less prone to some diseases, but because of that they can be carriers and as such spreaders of genetic diseases (unwillingly) So who is the parasite if you look at it from that perspective?

Secondly the “logical’ conclusions drawn from it are beyond the point where I want to consider start to counter the total and utter gibberish. There is so so much we do not know about genetics that this is just fantasy thrown in with some scientific facts and twisted and turned to show what you want it to show.
Before I end up lecturing, I sign off shaking my head in utter disbelief.

]]> By: Luc http://femaleledrelationships.net/superior-supremacy-female/female-superiority-scientific-fact#comment-1156 Luc Sat, 18 Dec 2010 02:34:35 +0000 http://www.femaleledrelationships.net/?p=283#comment-1156 ok, i completely disagree with most of this. yes, women are more biologically complex in the sense that they have more genes, however, men, having a pair of genes that don't match up, and also through evolution, have far more changes on the genetic code happen over the course of their lives. as for the fact that women have a larger hub for emotion and memory, men have a much larger hub for logic and spatial memory(why we often refuse directions because we don't need them, not because we think we don't need them. giv us time, we'll figure out how to get there eventually.) and I'm also quite glad that you barely mentioned man's unimportance in the sexual sense, because as far as I can tell, woman do have a more important part in that. They carry the baby. however, sperm carry have the sperm, and, throughout history, men have done the work while women carry said baby. Now, society is making it easier for women wo work, and care for children in the work-place, but I disagree with this option. It makes the caring for the child a somewhat less important job. something you can multitask(which I know you women always rub in men's faces). But it isn't. caring for a child is important, and should be someone's main focus, or at least kept a focus seperate of work. Many women have suggested that men be the care-givers, and care for the child while the women works. I'm all for this, however, it's still the same equal importance of man and woman, just switched. ok, i completely disagree with most of this. yes, women are more biologically complex in the sense that they have more genes, however, men, having a pair of genes that don’t match up, and also through evolution, have far more changes on the genetic code happen over the course of their lives.

as for the fact that women have a larger hub for emotion and memory, men have a much larger hub for logic and spatial memory(why we often refuse directions because we don’t need them, not because we think we don’t need them. giv us time, we’ll figure out how to get there eventually.)

and I’m also quite glad that you barely mentioned man’s unimportance in the sexual sense, because as far as I can tell, woman do have a more important part in that. They carry the baby. however, sperm carry have the sperm, and, throughout history, men have done the work while women carry said baby. Now, society is making it easier for women wo work, and care for children in the work-place, but I disagree with this option. It makes the caring for the child a somewhat less important job. something you can multitask(which I know you women always rub in men’s faces). But it isn’t. caring for a child is important, and should be someone’s main focus, or at least kept a focus seperate of work. Many women have suggested that men be the care-givers, and care for the child while the women works. I’m all for this, however, it’s still the same equal importance of man and woman, just switched.

]]>