<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Female Pre-Eminence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://femaleledrelationships.net/superior-supremacy-female/female-pre-eminence-the-dignity-and-excellency-of-that-sex-above-the-male/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://femaleledrelationships.net/female-led-historical-curiosities/female-pre-eminence-the-dignity-and-excellency-of-that-sex-above-the-male</link>
	<description>Femdom Psychology, Philosophy, Female Domination, Male Submission Theory &#38; Practice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 03:18:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irv O. Neil</title>
		<link>http://femaleledrelationships.net/female-led-historical-curiosities/female-pre-eminence-the-dignity-and-excellency-of-that-sex-above-the-male#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>Irv O. Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femaleledrelationships.net/?p=412#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>Thanks for linking to this--must check it out!

Off the top of my head it seems to me, however, that anything written along these lines back in those days could not help but be regarded on some level as the equivalent of today&#039;s femdom erotica. To even put the notion of women&#039;s superiority into people&#039;s heads back then must have been regarded as a titillating notion. I would not be surprised if people masturbated after or while reading these scholarly tracts. 

Or maybe I just have an inherently dirty mind and can see the pornography/erotica in places where other people do not...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for linking to this&#8211;must check it out!</p>
<p>Off the top of my head it seems to me, however, that anything written along these lines back in those days could not help but be regarded on some level as the equivalent of today&#8217;s femdom erotica. To even put the notion of women&#8217;s superiority into people&#8217;s heads back then must have been regarded as a titillating notion. I would not be surprised if people masturbated after or while reading these scholarly tracts. </p>
<p>Or maybe I just have an inherently dirty mind and can see the pornography/erotica in places where other people do not&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Gynécocratie ou La Domination de la Femme &#171; Female Led Relationships</title>
		<link>http://femaleledrelationships.net/female-led-historical-curiosities/female-pre-eminence-the-dignity-and-excellency-of-that-sex-above-the-male#comment-1299</link>
		<dc:creator>La Gynécocratie ou La Domination de la Femme &#171; Female Led Relationships</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 03:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femaleledrelationships.net/?p=412#comment-1299</guid>
		<description>[...] Female Pre-Eminence [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Female Pre-Eminence [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

