I have to confess I had no intention of keeping this site going for very long.
Essentially I had problems with the rhetoric of some people, particularly some guys, who write about female on top heterosexual power exchange.
Then people I value started leaving comments.
I’m not sure to what degree that I can add words of distinct value here that wouldn’t go as well or better on some of my other sites.
We’ll see.
Originally posted 2008-02-11 15:58:35. Republished by Blog Post Promoter
Related posts:
I think the name itself is an important reclaiming of the term. Perhaps, instead of elsewhere, some of your writing could go as well as better here than some of your other sites…?
I’m with May – didja ever think you were stretching your talents a little to thin?
You think I’m doing too much low quality stuff?
I don’t think it’s a matter of low quality at all.
I know May has a podcast and I’ve been thinking it would be great to get more going on the subject. I’ve been debating it myself but this would be a better venue I think when it comes to that subject-matter than my own blog.
to me a female in the lead isn’t nessarily a femdom. I shy way way far from femdom types. I do love to be around women that are able to make things happen. take the lead socially. I don’t want or need to be abused, whipped, bound and all that stuff tha subs love.
Personally I like the fact that there are all kinds of people commenting. The blog entries with all kids o f topics related to female led relationships is good. It makes clear in a few clicks how varied the interpretations are on the subject. It allows people to see different sides to one term. I love that fact.
I suspect though that there are a few people that are not getting through the moderation process. Being a moderator on fora myself I do empathize with the difficulties you encounter. If it is any consolation, it is not specific to a topic like this to have the difficulties with commentators.