The Great MCD Debate

Enforced male chastity regimens sometimes but not always include a male chastity device like the Curve, CB6000 and other more obscure and expensive MCDs.

Some, adopting a purist stance, claim that is a man requires a MCD for orgasm control, claim that the man is not genuinely submissive. A flawed perspective.

It assumes there’s a litmus test for a quality known as true submission. That there is one way and no other way for a man to surrender to the loving female authority of his girlfriend, mistress or wife.

Many of these devices are not really inescapable. Even though he might be able to get out of it some men are probably able to practice self-denial only with the aid of a MCD because they need an extra barrier to enable them to control their erotic appetites. It is a help.

Some men treasure a MCD as a physical symbol of his surrender to the woman in his life. A binding that is always present even when he is away from her.

Baldly: there are men who need penis bondage to help them eroticize the experience. Without it the experience can become flat, dull: boring and lose all value. And they enjoy the reward / punishment games that determine when the MCD will be removed.

Wearing a male chastity device is not sign of failure or insincerity. Rejecting the psychology of the individual man is foolish at best.

Originally posted 2008-05-01 15:12:29. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

No related posts.

Comments

  1. nigel says:

    Is it possible that the use of male chastity cages, is a pyschological subterfuge in which the “device” creates a focal point for the flacid penis and metaphoricaly enlarging it into a psuedo-erection? Therefore surrender through CBT becomes a new method of subverting female sexuality by not only martyring male orgasm but making the penis not the vagina the centre of attention.

    There maybe a historical fashion precedent with the use of cod peices in Elizabethan male clothing. Please note the irony in the feminine title of the era.

  2. Lisa M. says:

    Finally, a rational discussion by women about the pros and cons of MCDs. Many would argue that the woman that is doing everything correctly to control her male sexually should not need him to wear a chastity device. However, I have found that my husband is, at his core, untrustworthy. His penis rules him, and not the other way ’round. We went around and around the cycle of him focussing his sexual attention on images of other women for sexual gratification, me throwing him out, him crawling back promising to reform, etc. I finally resorted to forced chastity for him, and it seems to be the only way. I found that if I have absolute control over his penis, then I have his undivided attention, loyalty, devotion, etc. On the one hand, he is willing to submit to this humiliation in order to remain with me. We both know that he’d masturbate to my lingerie catalogs the first chance he’d get, so I don’t ever give him the chance. I know that there are thousands of other women who have discovered male chastity devices as a means of living happily ever after with their men.

  3. Dev says:

    Yuck.

    That’s all I have to say.

  4. doris says:

    I had attempted to wear a Choirboy CD but this was not successful.

    I am in total agreement that MCD should be required of all men who report to and adore the woman.

  5. Paul says:

    I’m a male sub that has done it both ways, with a chastity device, and without, relying just on willpower and “mental” chastity. I find it more powerful and more meaningful to remain orgasm-free without the MCD, because then I have to make the effort, constantly, everyday.

    And I don’t masturbate/cheat without a MCD — I simply learned not to, over a period of years. I don’t cum without permission.

    I’m sure that there are many men who prefer the device or have to have it because they lack self-control, but I’m not one of them.

    It may depend on the amount of time between orgasms, though. I’ve never had to go more than 2 weeks.

  6. subtoy says:

    i have not used a chastity device because my wife does not want me to and since this is ultimately about her pleasure, i’ve learned to abstain (with some failings) without any restraint because that is what i have been told to do. At the same time, i would let my wife pierce my dick and lock me in a steel tube if that was what she wanted.

  7. John says:

    I find it flattering and I’ve said this before. Part of the general wave of gender reversal is that we men are becoming more objectified. I find a turnon that a woman could be so jealous and possessive of my genitalia as to want to lock it up.

  8. Roadrunner says:

    I see no reason for a man to wear a chasity device unless HE WANTS TO Not forced into it by a dominate woman. I have been married to the same woman for 29 years and not been into another woman. I se no reason to refrain from having a good orgasm Keeps your mind right. coin an old saying Use it or lose it. If my wife would get the idea of me wearing one of these except for some kinky sex for an evening NO WAY. I wouldn’t do it even under threat of divorce.Like don’t let the door hit you in the ASS when leaving

Speak Your Mind

*