La Gynécocratie ou La Domination de la Femme

Something to go with Female pre-eminence, or, The dignity and excellency of that sex above the male: an ingenious discourse.

The original title was A Narrative of the Adventures and Psychological Experiences of Julian Robinson (afterwards Viscount Ladywood) Under Petticoat-Rule, written by himself. Also Gynecocracy, The Adventures of Julian Robinson. Attributed to Viscount Ladywood. First published in 1893. Gynecocracy was translated in French as La Gynécocratie ou La Domination de la Femme, par Jacques Desroix, précédé d’une Étude sur le Masochisme dans l’Histoire et les Traditions .

Gynecocratie Masochisme

Gynocracy

Read it? Want to?

Originally posted 2010-01-04 10:35:05. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Female Pre-Eminence

I knew Cornelius Agrippa only as a Renaissance magus. Discovering the title page of Female pre-eminence was a surprise.

Female Superiority Cornelius Agrippa

Modern feminist scholarship has found Agrippa one of the most interesting authors of the sixteenth century, for his little treatise De nobilitate et praecellentia foeminei sexus declamatio / On the Nobility and Superiority of the Female Sex surpasses in radicalism most treatments of women written in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Usually such treatises were collections of biographical sketches of famous women. Such books generally praised their subjects for possession of traditionally feminine traits even as they achieved the deeds that made them famous. Like most books published in his time, Agrippa’s De praecellentia was written in part to attract a patron: it was originally composed in 1509 to win favor from Margaret of Austria, regent of the Habsburg Netherlands, but not presented to her until 1529, when Agrippa had become official historiographer of the Netherlands, which Margaret still administered as regent for her nephew, the Emperor Charles V. Agrippa included De praecellentia in his first published book, a collection of short tracts and orations printed at Antwerp in 1529 (it was later included in his Opera, 2: 518–42). Whatever favor he may have gained was short-lived, however, since Margaret turned hostile in 1530 when theologians at Louvain condemned his recently published De vanitate as impious and heretical.

Nevertheless, his treatise in praise of women had considerable literary success. There were several reprints in Latin (the first in 1532), and translations into many vernaculars: French (1530), German (1540), English (1542), Italian (1544), Polish (1575), and Dutch (1611). There were at least two versified adaptations (into French and English), and a frequently reprinted Italian adaptation, La nobiltà delle donne (1549) by Lodovico Domenichi. Agrippa’s book became a major influence on popular discussions of the nature and status of women, though since it maintained what the chauvinist mentality of the age regarded as the absurd proposition that women are inherently equal, or even superior, to men, it was usually interpreted as a paradox written to amuse but not to be taken seriously.

Literary scholars of recent times have tended to adopt the same interpretation, though perhaps not for quite the same reasons. …

For the rest scroll down to The Praise of Women: Paradox or Feminist Tract?.

The text is online for your reading pleasure: Female pre-eminence, or, The dignity and excellency of that sex above the male: an ingenious discourse.

Originally posted 2010-01-04 09:33:58. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Gynosupremacy

Gynosupremacy: gynarchy with an unequivocal label. Some gynosupremacists advocate lifetime chastity for men whose semen will be extracted for breeding purposes but never allowed an orgasm.

Then again there is Laura Goodwin.

Originally posted 2007-07-14 15:51:18. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Inferior Men Want

Male Inferiority

Inferior Man Superior Woman

Men Want

  • Men want to be treated like beasts
  • Men want to be feminized, sissyfied
  • Men want to be spanked and whipped
  • Men want to be humiliated
  • Men want to be told that they are inferior

Men want many things. Even genuinely submissive men. They wouldn’t be human otherwise.

But many men seeking a dominant woman frame it as men deserve. Because men are not as nice as women.

So women must require men to be naked and wear panties.

The falsehood of male inferiority outside of roleplay is one of the great hindrances to female dominant relationships.

Men top from the bottom in asserting they are the very bottom of human existence.

Since women don’t often seek after inferior garbage they seen submissive men with greater respect and the female supremacy fans are left with no one.

Read more about Female Supremacy

First Church of Female Supremacy

It has been ages since I first ran across the First Church of Female Supremacy aka the Cybelians.

A cult – of sorts – pushing female led marriages. Among the cult’s dogmas are these mandatory aspects of Cybelian marriage.

The first statutory aspect is that the man has absolutely no freedom – while at home he must always be naked and collared, the collar to be of the lockable variety. The second statutory aspect is that the man has no status other than that of a toilet for the woman’s use

When I first discovered them the Cybelians seemed humorlessly fanatical about the piss business. It was like sharing bread and wine are for Christians. They’ve also come to push sissyfication and cuckoldry.

Other aspects of a Cybelian marriage which are a matter of choice include cuckoldry – wherein it is the wife’s option to have sex with as many other men as she chooses, compliant physical punishments, humiliation, and extended restriction of freedom. Details of all these options can be found in the Cybelian Marriage Manual, available as an eBook direct from this website.

Human male castration tool.

Aside from the marriage manual there’s a host of ebooks for sale. Topics include ancient secrets known only to the Cybelian elite, golden showers, extreme female domination.

I’ve always thought that the church and its messy interlocking set of websites exist to lure in the most sexually frustrated of men. Lonely submissive men make easy targets.

The name comes from the ancient cult Cybele: religious ecstatics who castrated themselves. Ancient castration device on the right.

Originally posted 2009-01-17 14:18:08. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Darkside Goddess Kali

The Service of Mankind Church of the Darkside Goddess Kali calls itself a “religio-erotic gynosupremic” community.

This is the female supremacist fantasy carried to its nuttiest extreme:

We believe that wars, severe natural disasters, famine plagues, and the general suffering of innocents can be avoided by appeasing the Darkside Goddess by our rituals of male atonement for the sins of all mankind.

To end earthquakes, typhoons and presumably poverty and roadside litter men must be made to “to endure hardship, torment and abasement.”

Interpretations of the Kali myth apt to startle the most inventive Hindu theologian.

Originally posted 2009-04-18 04:57:26. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Laura Goodwin

Many people who use words like female supremacy actually believe in political and social equality for all genders. This isn’t to say that they aren’t dominant; don’t exercise power over men – enslave them.

Laura Goodwin is a stellar example:

Now I’ll tell you what gynosupremacists aren’t: we aren’t sexists. All men and women are equal under the Goddess. SHE is the Mother of us all, and loves us all equally. In my religion, each person is divinely authorized to be an agent for the Goddess or God. We assert that the body, the world, and life itself is sacred, deserving respect and preservation, and yes, I do want to see those values reflected in my daily life.

Gynosupremacy

For her gynosupremacy is a means of seeking balance in dealing with the legacies of millennia of patriarchy. And I suspect she finds it a beautiful metaphor.

On the web the bulk of hard-line gynosupremacists are mostly professional dominatrices. And the online and telephone sex workers seeking monetary tribute fill the fattest slice of that.

For them female supremacy is a form of patter: the better to milk men of their money. While the majority of PSOs are honorable some are ruthless in taking advantage of lonely submissive men.

Originally posted 2008-11-14 15:46:38. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Hillary Clinton & Female Inferiority

Barbara Ehrenreich commenting on a New York Times article by Susan Faludi:

I share Faludi’s glee — up to a point. Surely no one will ever dare argue that women lack the temperament for political combat. But by running a racially-tinged campaign, lying about her foreign policy experience, and repeatedly seeming to favor McCain over her Democratic opponent, Clinton didn’t just break through the “glass floor,” she set a new low for floors in general, and would, if she could have got within arm’s reach, have rubbed the broken glass into Obama’s face.

Hillary Clinton smashed the myth of innate female moral superiority in the worst possible way — by demonstrating female moral inferiority. We didn’t really need her racial innuendos and free-floating bellicosity to establish that women aren’t wimps. As a generation of young feminists realizes, the values once thought to be uniquely and genetically female — such as compassion and an aversion to violence — can be found in either sex, and sometimes it’s a man who best upholds them.

Hillary’s Gift to Women

Originally posted 2008-05-13 13:45:07. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

I Believe Women Are Superior

By Gary

I am a submissive white male, marriage-minded, and man enough to know my place.

I believe deeply in the natural superiority of Women. I believe Women are the superior Sex as a plain and simple fact of life, and a clear and undeniable fact of nature. While it is true that men are generally bigger and stronger than Women physically, that is all, and even that is not always the case.

But I believe Women are generally superior to men mentally, emotionally, sexually, psychologically, and biologically, and far better suited to the roles of leadership and positions of authority at all levels of society than men are – in government and politics, in the business and corporate world and workplace, and especially within Their marriages and relationships.

I believe that in marriage, the Wife should be the undisputed Head of the house and family, and the sole Decision Maker, and the husband should be obedient to his Wife, and belongs completely under Her authority in all aspects of the marriage – both outside the home and in the home, both outside the bedroom and in the bedroom. I believe this represents the most ideal, most natural gender roles for marriages and relationships, and is the way marriages and relationships were meant to be.

I believe anytime a Woman feels Her husband has disobeyed Her or displeased Her in any way, it should be Her legal right to whip his naked, manly little ass, and lay down the law to him. I believe this should be a Woman’s right for Her to maintain an orderly home, and to ensure that Her husband remains properly obedient to Her, and ALWAYS knows his place.

I believe when a man gets married, he should openly acknowledge his Wife’s fully legal authority over him, by taking the wedding vow of obedience, to love, honor, and OBEY his Wife.

I believe when a man gets married, he should openly recognize his Wife’s rightful role as the undisputed Head of the house and family, by taking his Wife’s Name in the marriage, becoming the lawfully wedded mr. Her Name, and that a married couple should live openly and without apology as Ms. and mr. Her Name.

Originally posted 2009-11-16 19:00:53. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Men Are For Use

Do you feel that men exist solely for utilitarian purposes? That women should feel free to treat men as if they were, say, furniture?

Mistress Stands on Slave -Male Back

Originally posted 2010-03-06 20:32:26. Republished by Blog Post Promoter