Female Supremacy?

Yahoo Answers gets asked the least expected questions:

Would Sarah Palin make a good dominatrix? ?

Female Superiority?

First answer:

Dude, I was thinking the same thing…I’d like her to dominate me lol!

Dept. of Stereotypes:

I totally think so. She reminds me of a librarian and I think they are all secret dominatrix. Also wouldn’t she look hot in a tight leather outfit and a whip in her hand. Also she should wear her glasses with the leather.

Usually, stuck up, dominant, naturally bitchy women do not make good dominatrices. A good dominatrix only pretends to be a *****.

Regardless what one may think of the woman, she doubtlessly fills the fantasies of many masochistic men. Perhaps offering even more thrills to the liberal males.

Originally posted 2010-07-01 17:41:31. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

There are submissive men who say they live the life of a 1950s housewife, homemaker. Their wives earn all the money and the men are financially dependent on them.

And there are men who confess they envy this status.

But I don’t know if I’ve seen dominant women saying they want a man like this.

Have you?

Originally posted 2008-05-01 08:59:43. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

My friends, it is interesting to see how many of you seem suddenly to have discovered this site.

Really there’s only so much to be said in a general way. Affairs of the heart and libido are complex but really the solutions boil down to simple matters of pluck, good will, patience and the like. Much easier said than done.

I do hope you won’t be shy in sharing both your disagreement and let me know what may be of aid to you.

Originally posted 2007-12-31 14:19:34. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Carrie: the girlfriend you always wished you had. But probably not dominant. Her obsessive show buying does work for me.

Miranda: the one you were most likely to know. Certainly capable.

Charlotte: her kinkiest experience was probably dating the cunnilingus addict.

Samantha: what couldn’t she, wouldn’t she do? But she wasn’t interested in that guy with a dungeon built into his closet.

Can you make any connection between female led relationships and Sex and the City?

Originally posted 2008-05-30 21:55:04. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

When I saw this illustration I couldn’t help but think of Train Male Children to Be Submissive.

Originally posted 2011-03-08 15:00:50. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Perhaps a Gagged SAM

Smart Ass Masochist Defined

Smart Ass Masochist. These are masochists who don’t know how to simply
ask for what they want. Instead, they make a game of making tops and
others genuinely angry so they will get beaten up. They have a sick
need to inflame real rage in people. They are psychos, and just plain no
fun to play with.

SAMs are a big cause of guilt and hard feelings in the scene, and
especially out of the scene. Just because you go off on them like they
want you to doesn’t mean they will praise you after. NO. Often they
accuse their victims of being abusive bullies, and try to make them take

the whole blame for the violence that they provoked.

There are psychological masochists who like to be verbally abused, and
they have their SAM equivalent. You can see people like this trolling
for abuse all over the net.

Some people in the BDSM scene call themselves SAM, like it’s cute, like
calling yourself a pervert. Being a SAM is not like being an adorable
“brat”. Brats are fun: SAMs are not. Originally and properly, to be
called a SAM is a straight up insult. People, please use the term
correctly. It’s only slang, but we still don’t want it to become
meaningless from misuse.

Demurral:

SAM’s are not brats, but they aren’t necesarilly bad either. As long
as it is consentual, people can be sammy all they like. Brat has
connotations of cute, SAM doesn’t, so they are distinct in the positive
sense. But if someone wnats to do some verbal sparring during a scene, I
see no eason they shouldn’t, as long as the top knows about it and is
okay.

From an old discussion on Usenet.

Submissive Men Online: Authentic or Immature

[Some men] merely want the fantasy of being
dominated, without the annoyances and difficulties that actually make
submission worth while. I’m sure they would happily lick your boots or
sniff your panties or gag themselves for you; the form without the
emotion. You’ve probably met a lot more of these type of people than I
ever will and so probably have a better idea of what they would do.

Sure, some of them may just be immature people with adolescant fantasies
of a 6’6″ muscular woman dressed in shiny PVC wielding a crop and demanding
a craven slave to humiliate himself. Some may just see you as a sex
object (“look Beavis, I sent an email to a Domme! It was good!”).

It would not surprise me if all of these types so far would be
disappointed and not respond when they realise you just want a pack of
chocolate Smarties (the UK type which is also in Canada, not the US candy
type) rather than a something more kinky. I’ve seen a fair few of these
on IRC. Does what they do/want fall under the BDSM umbrella? I won’t
say “no” to that question. It doesn’t float my boat nor that of most the
people I respect, but that’s just really YKINMK.

We have another class; those who truely believe they are ‘do anything’
submissives. They may be so desperate for a D/s relationship that they
go overboard and write messages that are indistinguishable from the above
class. Sometimes they get into relationships and take a collar then a month
or so down the line realise something is missing and the relationship ends.
I’m no expert here, but I get a feeling that they are putting the cart before
the horse; trying to build a relationship on top of D/s where what they really
want is a relationship _with_ D/s.

Finally we get the mature type; those who realise you are a real person with
real needs; who may only know you through your fiction and your writings
but consider you trustworthy and are willing to help you out with a request.
They may be in a relationship already, or be alone, but they are stable
enough and happy enough and mature enough to talk to you without any
expectations. These are the kind of people I like to talk to online and
at munches because they can talk rationally about what they do and I can
discuss and learn from them.

However, the question isn’t about that type, but about the others.
I think it’s inevitable that something like BDSM will atract the
immature. We, here on the newsgroups and on our personal sites, are
pretty open with our sexuality, and to the immature sexuality == sex.
People may read your story of putting Hasek into a straight jacket (it
was him, wasn’t it? Tori considers him the “most flexible”) find
themselves getting an erection and come begging to you “please please
put me in it, I’ll do anything” .

These people don’t fit _into_ my scene at all; they are on the periphery.
But then I’m not the famous Akasha and I’m not a Dom. I don’t have my
own groupies. I’m just Tori’s slave. I don’t get people mailing me at
random wanting to tie me up (choruses of “shame! shame!” ). These people
are possibly more intrusive in your life.

(From an old usenet discussion.)